![]() |
|
SageTV Software Discussion related to the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV software application should be posted here. (Check the descriptions of the other forums; all hardware related questions go in the Hardware Support forum, etc. And, post in the customizations forum instead if any customizations are active.) |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Anyway you can sacrifice one of the PCI slots (non needed modem) and get a PCI video card?
Maybe something else in PCI can be substituted for USB? |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Onboard video does not immediately translate into slow for video. Most modern (e.g. last 5-7 years) ATI onboard chips have video acceleration built-in. My laptop has a low-end ATI onboard chip (IGP320m) and it can handle video display quite handily.
I don't know anything about Intel based onboard graphics chips so if you have one of those you should research the specifics of that chip itself. For the records, if you don't have hardware-based video acceleration, then your high cpu utilization is to be expected. Regarding the decoders, I use the Hauppauge provided ones (non-Css ...) My desktop machine has a cpu roughly equivalent to yours but has a discreet ATI video card so that keeps the utilization around 20%. Good luck. You have not specified what your onboard chip is. Quote:
__________________
amac's config: Sage 7.1.9, Java Java 1.7.0_75, Windows 8.1, Athlon X4 620, 4GB, Hauppauge 950Q, ATI 650HD video encoder with IR/Blaster, Radeon 5450, HDMI out, TV is primary monitor, Plex Plug-in serves up to mobile devices/PS3/WiiU just fine |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I checked and the onboard video is: Intel 810e (on motherboard). I looked up the motherboard name online and on hp's site for the machine name, it is a Xt963, it is a walmart special from a couple of years ago. The description says that it has shared architecture of the memory for the video. I have the memory maxed at 512mb, which it will only take in 2 x 256mb sticks, it won't even let me put in a single 512mb stick. It's been pretty stable, but it has no AGP slot for a video card, and it only has 3 pci slots. 2 of them are taken up by the pvr-150 hauppauge cards for sagetv. I had to remove the modem card to do that. I use cable internet, which is connected by an ethernet/usb adapter plugged into the usb port on the back of the machine. I did try the intervideo non-css decoder in the setup of sage, and it works fine without the hack in place (89-90% usage though), and with the hack on (1) settings in registry of both files, I can't use the intervideo non-css decoder, if I do, it gives me the small square boxes all over the screen, and the video is choppy and lagging. I know I should upgrade the motherboard to something with an AGP slot, but I can't afford it right now. When I get the money I'll probably get a better motherboard and use an Athlon XP 2200+ processor that I have laying around from another computer that the motherboard died in. Then I can put a decent motherboard in the hp to use with the sagetv setup. Any suggestions about which video card would be appreciated. One of you above suggested the nvidia 6000 series with 256mb on it? I would like to get one for a reasonable price around $50? if that is possible. Well, at least from all the help everyone has offered it does seem that my large cpu usage is because of the limits of the onboard video and the 1.2 celeron processor. At least now I know that with the better setup I could achieve a lower cpu usage and still use the machine for other things occasionally. ![]() |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
If you're planning on upgrading, I'd go with an entirely new machine. Those HP's usually have very small power supplies in them, and any bigger board will severely tax it. You'd be better off to keep the HP as-is, use it for a desktop PC, and build a PC in a clone type case with a larger power supply.
__________________
Server: AMD Phenom 2 920 2.8ghz Quad, 16gb Ram, 4tb Storage, 1xHVR-2250, 1 Ceton Cable Card adapter, Windows 7 SP1 |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not sure what hack was used as mentioned in the original post. The Intel 810e does have hardware motion compensation, so it's a matter of enabling it in the registry, often for each decoder being used.
I checked and I believe PowerDVD and WinDVD seem to support the Intel chip. I thought the Hauppauge decoder was a derivative of one of those (but perhaps it dropped support for older chipsets). Prior to modifying the registry settings, my CPU was around 70% (or so I recall). If you're conversant with the Windows registry, try looking in the registry for bits to tweak with names that include 'DXVA' and 'HWMC'. I set the value of each of those to 1. Can't help beyond that, sorry. Good luck!
__________________
amac's config: Sage 7.1.9, Java Java 1.7.0_75, Windows 8.1, Athlon X4 620, 4GB, Hauppauge 950Q, ATI 650HD video encoder with IR/Blaster, Radeon 5450, HDMI out, TV is primary monitor, Plex Plug-in serves up to mobile devices/PS3/WiiU just fine |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amac,
I did that registry hack already. It has you change the value 0 to 1 in the two files of the hxwa and dixva or something like that. Like I said in the earlier post, when I downloaded the trial Nvidia decoder, it did lower the cpu usage to a much better level, but it would lock up the computer every time I tried to change the channel of a tv show I was watching. So, I have to remove the Nvidia decoder. I would really love to get this working better in this hp xt963 1.2 celeron because it is a great little computer otherwise. It will work fine with the default settings in sage as far as the decoder, but that way it keeps the cpu usage so high that when I try recording a tv show while I am watching another tv show, it sacrifices the recording quality. I think this is due to the sage default decoder using software which eats up the cpu usage. ![]() |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
What do you have for a tuner? Most hardware encoders are pretty much impervious to other stuff going on.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not sure if this will work for your setup, but try it anyways.
You may also need to make sure you have Java1.4.x version I hope this helps for you. -Polen
__________________
WMC Server: Windows 8.1, Dell PowerEdge T110, 12G ram, 2x2TB hd, 4xHDHR, HDHR Prime, 1000Mb/s Provider: Suddenlink Cable |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
CPU usage too high!
Hi Polen,
I tried what you suggested. It didn't work. It worked, but it didn't decrease the blotches of squares all over the screen in live tv. Nothing seems to make it better. I just went into the registry and removed the hack. I changed them back to the value of 0. (the dxva and hw something). And then I had to change the detailed setup to default on all the video settings. I tried to still use the nvidia decoder but it was terrible blotches and squares on the screen. I even tried the intervideo non-css decoder and it was the same. The only thing that seems to work well is the default settings. And, the cpu usage is back up to 70+%. I guess I will just have to get a better processor and motherboard and a good add on video card, the onboard video just isn't cutting it. Thanks for your help. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
I didn't see this earlier...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
I didn't want to say it, but Stanger is right.
Frey really needs to up there minimum requirements for a system. -Polen
__________________
WMC Server: Windows 8.1, Dell PowerEdge T110, 12G ram, 2x2TB hd, 4xHDHR, HDHR Prime, 1000Mb/s Provider: Suddenlink Cable |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
One of my clients is a XP-1700 underclocked to 1100 mhz which makes it the equivalent of an XP-1100 (if there were such a thing) and it only uses 40-50% cpu with a 6200 agp card. I have no doubts thomjw could get acceptable playback if a decent agp card could be added. I had a GeForce3 running with VMR9 at 1280*1024 before getting the 6200. It took a lot of tweaking, but I eventually got smooth playback out of it. Last edited by blade; 09-21-2006 at 09:21 PM. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|