|
SageTV Linux Discussion related to the SageTV Media Center for Linux. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV Linux should be posted here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"stair-stepping" on diagonal lines?
I've been seeing really-nasty "aliasing" in all video recorded on my Linux SageTV box. Hoping that it was an artifact of the native mplayer playback, I installed the Sage client on my XP box and saw exactly the same thing. I've attached a couple of screenshots taken from the client.
Is there something I can do to avoid this? Is this another artifact of the interlace/deinterlace/reinterlace issue? Thanks! -Ben |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
For what it's worth, it appears that this is a playback issue, not an encoding problem. If I transfer the mpeg to my PC and play it with VLC, the lines magically become clean and straight again. If, however, I play it either on the Sage server or from a Sage client, the lines become horribly aliased.
Is anyone else seeing this with the Linux version? -Ben |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
It's a deinterlacing problem. No clue how to solve it on linux.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I notice it a little bit with my MVP, but that would be the only way I could imagine to get around it for now..... unless someone used a different media player and used something like a Dxr3 or H+ for MPEG playback.....
Lauren |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Has anyone experimented with the other deinterlacing modes available for mplayer?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
-Ben |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
-PGPfan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The default mode used is "ffmpeg" which eliminates all the typical "ghosting" problems caused by deinterlacing, but at the expense of really nasty jaggedy lines. I haven't been able to determine for sure how this filter works, but it appears to be removing the alternate lines and doubling the remaining ones. Crude. Very crude. I need to do some more tests with the rest, but so far I'm rather fond of the "cubic interpolating deinterlacer". Overall image detail seems much higher. Unfortunately it, and the other modes I tried, all seem to suffer from some nasty ghosting problems during rapid horizontal movement. Frankly, even un-deinterlaced video appears much cleaner than the ffmpeg mode, as long as there are no horizontal camera pans... -Ben |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"linear blend" -> Good image detail, very nasty ghosting
"linear interpolating" -> Very poor detail, almost as ugly as ffmpeg, minimal ghosting "cubic interpolating" -> Better detail than linear, but still lousy. Minimal ghosting. "median" -> Better detail than cubic, almost acceptable. No visible ghosting. "ffmpeg" -> Horrendous detail, no ghosting. "FIR lowpass" -> Good detail, light ghosting. Ghosting all but imperceptible on live-action TV, somewhat more visible in animation. Overall, switching to the "FIR lowpass" deinterlacing postprocessor has dramatically improved the quality of the video. -Ben |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
FWIW, "un-deinterlaced" video is just called "interlaced". Might help to avoid any confusions.
-PGPfan |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Aye, but "un-deinterlaced" is so much more fun to say!
-Ben |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|