|
General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SageTV light years ahead of BeyondTV
Having tried the demo on both versions, I can't believe BeyondTV is asking about the same price for such a clearly inferior product. The Menu options in BeyondTV are so rudimentary its unbelievable. I keep thinking am I missing something with BeyondTV is there another option to enable the other menus?
Where are all the recording preferences and favorites etc..The only menu that appears in BeyondTV is a main menu with 6 choices. It looks like SageTV is the winner by a mile. I am interested in hearing from you on your feedback. Who do you think offers the best product? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sage V7x: Server - Lenovo K320 with WindowsHomeServer2011, 10 Terabyte HD's on stablebit drivepool, (1 x DuoFlex CT Octopus PCIe DVB-C 4 Tuner all with LM-DVB-SmartRecorder, dbox2, run SageTV as Service, DeskNow Mail and Collaboration server, 2 Terabyte NAS (Ximeta) as seconf backup, 1Gb/s MSI ePower HD Network, 3xHD100, 1xHD200, 1xHD300, Panasonic LCD 55" TV, Sharp LCD TV, JVC LCD TV, Touchscreen LCD, PlaceShifter cu at http://www.dbuschek.de |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I also bought BeyondTV and now use Sage. To be fair, I think the main configuration of BeyoneTV is via the web interface...once you find it!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Own both... I use SageTV
Actually I think Beyond TV is good and its big downfall to me was lack of custimization. Where as with sage there are a lot of addon and you coudl always build somethign in studio. On the flip side I think Sage TV is harder to get setup so if I wasn't a power user i might be using BTV.... or not |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I'm also considering both, but from where I am now I will probably go for BeyondTV and not SageTV. mainly because I need one special feature and that is to run a batch file against the files after recording. This can easilly be done in BeyondTV, but SageTV seems to be unable to handle such a task.
To those of you who has been using both, what about some comparisons regarding recording quality? (You should know that I'm only looking for a recorder, not a playback solution) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Where is that web interface? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
BTV is not too bad and does not some niche features. However, you have to be willing to give up some regular PVR functionality. Little things begin to nag you like lack of full timeshifting (only in one screen), no preview or video background, ugly menus (but I think laid out better), poor support for anything but TV (even having ffdshow installed causes problems with it).
I guess it comes down to them being in constant catchup to Sage and MCE. I would like to see them come out with some unique new technology rather than just copying the other two with every release.
__________________
Check out SageMC16x9 - Where form is function . Don't forget the check out the SageMC16x9 Wiki if you have any configuration or general usage questions. New content is being added all the time! |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I have three licesnses for both and have settled on Sage. Funny how one man's weakness is anothers strength and vice versa. I for one like the fact that BTV is easy and has many less customizations. Sure, customizations are nice but they add complexity. My main reason for Sage? MediaMVP support and intelligent recording. If BTV had those features I would use BTV instead.
Both are excellent products but each will appeal to a different audience. Sage will almost certainly be more appealing to techies and people who generally like to tweak things. BTV will be more appealing to those who do not want to (or can't) fool around with customizations. Rather than focus on weaknesses, here's what I see as strengths of each product. This is subjective and certainly not complete. BTV strengths: - Easier to navigate, many less options to fiddle with. - Easy to create custom recording qualities. - Build in support for smart skipping and compression to DivX/WMV. - Strong forum support. Sage strengths: - Highly customizable. - MediaMVP support. - Intelligent recording. - Preview window on many menus. - Strong forum support. Anyway, now that I've come to grips with Sage I like it a lot and am impressed with it's functionality and reliability. YMMV. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Check out SageMC16x9 - Where form is function . Don't forget the check out the SageMC16x9 Wiki if you have any configuration or general usage questions. New content is being added all the time! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I am a big fan of SageTV (I actually own BTV and Meedio, including Meedio TV as well).
Anyhow, one thing that BTV offers that I REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY wish would be offered on SageTV is remote setup of recordings. From BTV's features page: Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr _______ Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I forgot a few things:
Yes, I like remote recording in BTV but I like nielm's webserver A LOT better than anything BTV offers. I've seen the work of a lot of talented programmers and nielm ranks high on the list. Another major strength of Sage - it really supports multiple drives for recording. Using multiple drives on BTV is a hassle. I also dislike BTV forums being censored (thanks for the reminder mlbdude), this thread would have been deleted 3 nanoseconds after it was started. I said I would not focus on weaknesses but I have to say the wiz.bin "single point of failure" is a weakness of Sage. BTV stores all the program data at the end of the .MPG so you don't lose all data if a single file gets corrupted. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I once posted a post on their forum about the fact that their continual sensorship was causing me to look elsewhere (why I ended up at Sage) and guess what they sensored the post!
__________________
Intel Core Duo 2.5mhz, 2gb RAM Windows Home Server, Sage 7 beta 2 Hauppauge PVR-250, 1 PVR-500 MCE 1 HDHomeRun 4TB Storage, GB Network 2 MVPs, 1 HD100 & 1 HD300 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Dirk |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have both, but use Sage. Both have unique features, Sage just has the ones I have more of a use for. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Since this is a Sage forum rife with Sage devotees, not likely to get much desention here.
Nevertheless, it seems to me that Sage is winning the PVR wars. Before I knew anything about BTV and Sage I tried trials of both. BTV lasted about 60 minutes. I had a dislike at the fundamental level with IIS, SQL, and .NET as the building blocks. I have personal preference for Java and Apache over the alternatives. Besides that, that particular version of BTV was crashing at every other turn so decided not to waste any more time with it. It is a credit to Andy (Opus4) for not running this forum with an iron fist. He has never censored anything to my knowledge just for being critical or stupid false claims being made of Sage. A great product needs no spin control and members can be trusted to always right the wrongs when they appear. Thanks Andy. DFA
__________________
Wrong information is worse than no information |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Nicely said.
__________________
Intel Core Duo 2.5mhz, 2gb RAM Windows Home Server, Sage 7 beta 2 Hauppauge PVR-250, 1 PVR-500 MCE 1 HDHomeRun 4TB Storage, GB Network 2 MVPs, 1 HD100 & 1 HD300 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I second that
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|