|
General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
DirecTV PC Card News!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20070109/tc_zd/198313
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I know senior folks at DirecTV. Don't expect anything from them soon. They are working on it, but with MSFT, and they are trying to work through a number of issues. Doing anything with MSFT takes quite a bit of time these days.
I have tried to convey to them just how bad the cablecard restrictions are, and they have an opportunity to steal quite a few highend users from cable if they get this right. thanks, mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't Directv have a pc card solution like 8 years ago? I remember researching this when I first got directv in 97.
This could be the one thing to bring me back. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
They did have one way back then, but even if you managed to find one of the few that were out there they probably wouldn't activate it for you. The new one should support all of the newer features also like HD and MPEG4...
The fact that a prototype exists is good enough news for me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
D* Card...yes please..
This article mentions that they might have to be Directv certified systems, which is just retarded. The only reason CableCard systems have to be certified is to protect the integrity of the cable system, which is very sensitive to spurs in the US and DS. Unless this system were two be bidirectional, which I doubt, there is should be no need for a 'certified' system and the time to market on these will be much quicker.
I for one, will hop on D* the moment the release one of these and tell Charter to stuff it. Hell, I work in the cable industry and it is becoming increasing hard to stomach. I can't wait for this solution to hit the shelves!! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
DirecTV's system is unidirectional anyway - that the point of plugging in that phoneline. I would expect that any kind of bidirectional use would be through the net or via dialup to them like their STBs do.
I'd be willing to be that if they don't require any kind of silly certification process, we'll see a lot of the hard core htpc world switching providers... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The reason CableLabs requires whole systems to be certified is to ensure the security/robustness/integrity of the recording/viewing device. In short, to make sure the device follows the rules for recording. Or to put it even more bluntly, to ensure the device uses the required level of DRM. And that it prevents the user from accessing the unencrypted digital broadcast. Basically there's no good reason other than they want control. For example, the OCUR "transcodes" from the Digicypher II encryption on the cable system to WM-RM in hardware, it then transfers the copy protected recording over USB. It should be enough that the tuner does the conversion to WM-RM in hardware, and they should allow any WM-RM compliant app to play the files and access the tuner, but they want the control and are restricting it's use to "certified" systems. Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sage Server: HP ProLiant N40L MicroServer, AMD Turion II Neo N40L 1.5GHz Dual Core, 8GB Ram, WHS2011 64bit, Sage 7.1.9 WHS, HDHR (1 QAM, 1 OTA), HDHR Prime 3CC, HD-PVR for copy-once movie channels HTPC Client:Intel DH61AG, Intel G620 cpu, 8GB ram, Intel 80GB SSD, 4GB RamDisk holding Sage/Java/TMT5 Sage Client:Sage HD-200 Extender Last edited by Kirby; 01-15-2007 at 11:55 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks, mike |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Server: MS Win7 SP1; FX8350 (H2O cooled); 8GB RAM; Hauppauge HVR-7164 (OTA); HVR-885 (OTA); SageTV 9.1.5.x; 12+TB Sage Storage Clients: HD300 x2; HD200 x2; Placeshifter Service: EPB Fiber (1Gb); OTA (we "cut the cord"); Netflix, Hulu, etc. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|