SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > Hardware Support > Hardware Support
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:38 AM
rdefino rdefino is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 771
Should I still use 64k Block in a raid for Sage

I will be setting up my new raid this weekend. I have 5- 2TB drives coming in. So I'm looking at either raid 5 to get make space, or raid 10 for make performance, especially when a drive fails.

Now do I still need to use 64k blocks when formatting? If not, what would be the best to use for sage?
__________________
SageTv server: 2008 64 BIT R2, Asus MN2-E, AMD dual core 4200, 4gb ram, Promise raid 5 8TB, 80gb Sata boot drive w/OS, 2/ dual tuner HDhomeruns, HD-PVR

3/HD-100's, 1/HD-200
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:05 AM
mikejaner's Avatar
mikejaner mikejaner is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chantilly VA
Posts: 2,087
Send a message via MSN to mikejaner
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdefino View Post
I will be setting up my new raid this weekend. I have 5- 2TB drives coming in. So I'm looking at either raid 5 to get make space, or raid 10 for make performance, especially when a drive fails.

Now do I still need to use 64k blocks when formatting? If not, what would be the best to use for sage?
SageTV 7 is supposed to be optimized to eliminate that performance tweak. It's not going to hurt anything if you do enable it.

See the following reference:
http://forums.sagetv.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48421
"Removed the need for formatting disks with 64k clusters in order to get optimal disk performance on Windows
Previously, we had recommended formatting Windows disks with 64k clusters in order to get optimal recording performance. This is no longer needed due to optimizations in the Windows capture system."
__________________
Mike Janer
SageTV HD300 Extender X2
Sage Server: AMD X4 620,2048MB RAM,SageTV 7.x ,2X HDHR Primes, 2x HDHomerun(original). 80GB OS Drive, Video Drives: Local 2TB Drive GB RAID5

Last edited by mikejaner; 10-15-2010 at 06:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:37 AM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
I still do it. I even do it for my file servers since rarely will I store something on my file server that is less than 64KB.
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:54 AM
gplasky's Avatar
gplasky gplasky is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howell, MI
Posts: 9,203
And keep in mind the recommendation was for Windows server. A Linux server didn't need this.

Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr
_______
Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2010, 08:06 AM
Trepidati0n Trepidati0n is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by gplasky View Post
And keep in mind the recommendation was for Windows server. A Linux server didn't need this.

Gerry
Yes, I see the comment about the formatting, BUT, does change with Sage7 apply only to windows 7 or does it also apply to WHS, XP? I was getting ready to pull my WHS drives one by one and reformat them for 64k just to get the duplication on the video (right now it is a separate non-pool drive).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:16 AM
gplasky's Avatar
gplasky gplasky is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howell, MI
Posts: 9,203
Since all the Windows servers should be using NTFS it should apply to all flavors.
Quote:
Removed the need for formatting disks with 64k clusters in order to get optimal disk performance on Windows
There really isn't a difference in NTFS between the different Windows flavor.

Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr
_______
Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How important is 64K block size msmith8228 Hardware Support 49 01-09-2010 07:08 AM
64K Block partitioning? pjpjpjpj SageTV Software 10 03-04-2008 01:40 PM
One user's experiences with RAID 0 and RAID 5 stevech Hardware Support 0 04-04-2007 09:57 PM
Anyone using an Un-Raid with Sage? lovingHDTV Hardware Support 0 01-11-2006 01:14 PM
64k block size and XP - is it compatible? Ctrl-Z Hardware Support 19 01-20-2005 12:31 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.