SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV Products > SageTV Software
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Software Discussion related to the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV software application should be posted here. (Check the descriptions of the other forums; all hardware related questions go in the Hardware Support forum, etc. And, post in the customizations forum instead if any customizations are active.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-10-2005, 12:11 PM
Menehune's Avatar
Menehune Menehune is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 403
My XP-install that I'm running an Apache server on at work is 2GB large (the "windows" directory). My Pagefile is another 1GB, for a system size of approx 3GB. I haven't tried to reduce the size by uninstalling anything. My C partition uses 4.5G out of 10gig.

I have a 10 gig system partition and a 70gig backup partition on an 80gig drive, so no worries about running out of space.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-10-2005, 12:12 PM
jominor's Avatar
jominor jominor is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by broderp
Speaking of fragmantation and such......how much space does Windows XP really need to be fully functional in sage? If I run a stripped down install of Windows, no "games" or calculators etc... what would that take? 100MB?? I'm thinking of partitionaing my first hard drive into two, one for the OS and the second for SAGE. (AS well as the second physical drive for sage recordings)

Any suggections of how large it should be for temp files, swap file setc....500MB? 1G?

Any links or suggestions? Or should I just leave it as one large drive?
I actually have only XP, Sage, and a few utilties installed on a older 20 gig drive installed internally. I can give you some numbers later when I'm at home.

All 6 of my other drives(5x200g, 1x250g) are internal drives utilizing USB2 enclosures.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-23-2006, 10:36 PM
davephan's Avatar
davephan davephan is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,911
Fragmentation with 64K block size

I setup a my second hard drive for video storage with 64K block size. I recently attempted to defragment the drive. The Windows 2000 defragmentation utility and the Diskeeper trial program could not defrag drives with block sizes larger than 4 K. The diskeeper utility indicates my 300 gig video drive with 64K blocks is very fragmented.

Does anyone know if there is utility to defrag 64k block sizes or perhaps it would be better to use 4k block sizes?

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-23-2006, 11:14 PM
InTheFlow InTheFlow is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by davephan
Does anyone know if there is utility to defrag 64k block sizes or perhaps it would be better to use 4k block sizes?

Dave
Hiya Dave!

You can use a program called Perfectdisk V 7.0 This is what I use and it is an excellent defragmenter. They also have a trial.

While you are checking out the website, click on the link for the PDF file called: "Perfectdisk vs Diskeeper Performance Test" I found it very enlightening. The link is under the "Perfect Disk Info Zone".

You don't want to reduce the size of your blocks for the video drive as that could degrade video playback performance.

Hope that helps!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-24-2006, 11:49 AM
stevech stevech is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,643
will the XP Pro defrag handle 64K blocks?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-24-2006, 12:25 PM
davephan's Avatar
davephan davephan is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,911
Defraging 64K Blocks

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevech
will the XP Pro defrag handle 64K blocks?
Thank you for suggesting the Perfectdisk 7.0 defragmentation program.

I contacted Raxco support and was informed that Windows 2000 Professional Workstation is limited to defragging 4k block sizes. The response time was very quick, only a few minutes by e-mail.

Greg Hayes from Raxco support (Perfectdisk 7.0) had the following response:

"Thanks for contacting Raxco Support!

Microsoft's defrag APIs under Windows 2000 will NOT defragmenters to
defragment drives with an NTFS cluster size greater than 4k. If you
have a 64k cluster size, there is NO defragmenter that will be able to
defragment this drive for you.

If you want to be able to defragment this drive, you will need to backup
the data, reformat with a 4k cluster size and then restore the data.

Microsoft has lifted this restriction with Windows XP and Windows Server
2003 - where they now allow defragmention on drives with a cluster size
up to and including 64k."

I followed up with another question about if defragmentation of 64k block sizes are supported on Window XP Home and Professional versions. Again, the e-mail response time was very quick, only a few minutes.

Both Windows XP Home and Professional support 64k block defragmentation.

I already used the Diskeeper demo to defragment my C drive, which contains the Windows 2000 Professional Workstation operating system and SageTV. The defragmentation made a huge difference in performance! Before the defragmentation, it too over 5 minutes of 100% sustained CPU starting SageTV. After the C drive defragmentation, the 100% sustained CPU load when starting up was significantly reduced.

Before I switched to the 64K block size for video storage, I did notice occasional stuttering. So, the larger block sizes do improve the SageTV performance.

I plan to rebuild the SageTV PC, or a replacement PC with Windows XP Home or Professional, then try the Perfectdisk 7.0 demo.

I reviewed some of the Perfectdisk 7.0 documentation on their web site. The Perfectdisk 7.0 disk defragment program appears to be vastly superior to Diskeeper.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-24-2006, 12:32 PM
elaw elaw is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, MA, USA
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by jominor
I do wonder if I'm starting to run up against any USB2 bandwidth issues. I now have 6 200 drives (3 Sage, 3 Divx) all connected via USB2 enclosures along with a USB2 Hauppage 250.

I must be getting close...
There actually might be something you can do about that...

Most modern PC's have multiple USB controllers. In XP (I think Win2K does this too), you can go into device manger and choose "view / devices by connection" from the menu to see what devices are connected to what controllers. You could then possibly rearrange things to divide the bandwidth.

Eric
__________________
Be alert! America needs more lerts.

Eric Law
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:53 PM
InTheFlow InTheFlow is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 76
My fault Dave, I didn't read the part where you said you were using Win2K. I'm actually running WinXPPro so never had that problem.

I'm glad Raxco responded to you so quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:17 PM
roxy99 roxy99 is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by jominor
I actually have only XP, Sage, and a few utilties installed on a older 20 gig drive installed internally. I can give you some numbers later when I'm at home.

All 6 of my other drives(5x200g, 1x250g) are internal drives utilizing USB2 enclosures.
That is one hell of a capacity. What are you storing anyway, the national archives?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:26 PM
dvd_maniac's Avatar
dvd_maniac dvd_maniac is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by roxy99
That is one hell of a capacity. What are you storing anyway, the national archives?
You can see from his post date that he posted that a little over a year ago. I'm sure he could easily have that completely full by now.

I have 1.2TB(4x400GB) on a raid-5 internally, 2x400GB internally, 2x160GB raid-0 internally (OS & Programs) and 1x400GB USB2 external. And guess what?
Many people here have a lot more...

By the way guys, who has the top capacity and how full is it???
__________________
If this doesn't work right, Then:
"I'm going to blow up the Earth!"
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:35 PM
aperry's Avatar
aperry aperry is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 680
I'm "limping along" at only about 850 GB on my three drives... One is very full, the other two (my recording drives) stay about 25% full.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.