SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV BETA Release Products > SageTV Beta Test Software
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Beta Test Software Discussion related to BETA Releases of the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. regarding SageTV Beta Releases should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2010, 05:47 PM
wallaceff wallaceff is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
back to back hard pad recording same tuner?

I live in Australia (yes, we got wolloped in the World Cup last night), and in this country the TV channels NEVER start and stop their shows at the scheduled time, so my recordings ALWAYS need some hard padding.

I'm wondring if someone can tell me if Version 7 can HARD PAD back to back recordings using just 1 tuner?
ie. recording from 7-8 with 10 mins hard pad and another set from 8-9, will it need more than 1 tuner?
I was hoping version 7 would solve this problem was wnated to find out before installing the beta.

Anyone know? and if its not possible, who do I dubmit a request for it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2010, 06:00 PM
Razillian's Avatar
Razillian Razillian is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 289
You can actually do it with most (all?) of the versions of Sage using the option "Remove Padding on Back to Back Favorites on the same Channel" under Customize in Detailed Setup.
__________________
blog: www.iamwhen.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-13-2010, 11:44 PM
wallaceff wallaceff is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
I think you misunderstand me. I WANT hard padding on back to back recordings, I just want it to use 1 tuner instead of 2! Does version 7 do this?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2010, 01:05 AM
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,355
sounds like he wants it padding on two files, using one tuner. as an example, with 5 minutes of front and back padding, the first file woudl record from 7:55-9:05 and the second file would record from 8:55-10:05. That time from 8:55-9:05 would be contained in both files.

So, the first file would be recording and Sage would need to start a second simultanious recording at 8:55 and have one tuner supply two streams for that 10-minute overlap. From what I've been told is that that is not possible due to the way that the graphs are built up an torn down.

If that is true tht it can't supply two graphs at the same time with one signal, I know of a way that it might be able to be done, but it would take some work. Take that example I mentioned above, If sage knew that there was a same-channel overlap, it could record the first show from 7:55-8:55 and then start a new file from 8:55-9:05 and then start a third file for the second show, from 9:05-10:05. By doing that, it could assign that 10-minute overlap files to both shows. That way, when you play back the first show, you play the 7:55-8:55 recording and then the 8:55-9:05 recording. Same for the second show, start with the 8:55-9:05 recording and then go to the 9:05-10:05 recording. Sage would need to be smart enough to know that it couldn't delete the 8:55-9:05 recording until both parent recordings had been deleted.
__________________
- Jack
__________________________________________
Server: AMD Phenom 9750, 2GB RAM, 2 Hauppauge PVR500, 1 Firewired DCT6200, 1 HDHomerun tuning 2 QAM channels, Vizio 37" HDTV LCD, 1 USB-UIRT

Clients: 1 MediaMVP, 1 Placeshifter Client, & 1 SageTV Client.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2010, 01:49 AM
GKusnick's Avatar
GKusnick GKusnick is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallaceff View Post
Does version 7 do this?
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wallaceff View Post
who do I dubmit a request for it?
Use the bug report form for feature requests. You're not the first to wish for this, but more votes can't hurt.
__________________
-- Greg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2010, 02:00 AM
wallaceff wallaceff is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Ok, will do. I just think its poor tuner management that it can't be done in 2010!
There a program TV Sheduler Pro, that from what I understand, can even record subchannels from the same stream using just 1 tuner!
Surely, thats the kind of tuner management we should be seeing??
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2010, 08:24 AM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallaceff View Post
Ok, will do. I just think its poor tuner management that it can't be done in 2010!
That would require writing two files from the same filtergraph, and changing the graph several times midstream. I think that would require a lot bigger rework of Sage's recording/file writing mechanism than they did for V7.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2010, 09:01 AM
wayner wayner is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 7,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallaceff View Post
I live in Australia (yes, we got wolloped in the World Cup last night)
True, but the Wallabies walloped the English in a sport that is more important!
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA
Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA
Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2010, 11:07 AM
GKusnick's Avatar
GKusnick GKusnick is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post
That would require writing two files from the same filtergraph, and changing the graph several times midstream. I think that would require a lot bigger rework of Sage's recording/file writing mechanism than they did for V7.
As far as I can see it shouldn't actually require tearing down and rebuilding the graph in midstream. All you'd really need is a forking filter that can write the same stream to two files, with the ability to redirect each branch to a different file (or no file) dynamically, without tearing down the graph. You then set up the graph once at the start of a string of back-to-back recordings, and redirect the outputs at the appropriate times to capture each program plus its padding to a separate file.

How much work it would be to actually implement this in Sage I would not care to speculate. But I'm hoping they get around to it at some point.
__________________
-- Greg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-14-2010, 02:47 PM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Well if they're still setup to rebuild the graph between recordings that would be a bit of work. I was hoping to see it in V7, but realistically, if they didn't implement that with the seamless transition work they've already done in V7, I'd not expect to see it soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recording back-to-back shows on one channel, plus record two separate PS off one TS MrFusion SageTV Software 13 08-26-2009 05:12 AM
back to back recording issue. broderp SageTV Software 1 06-25-2004 09:07 AM
Recording back to back Stargate IKK SageTV Beta Test Software 3 04-01-2004 12:40 PM
Bug? Back to Back rec, dual tuner PVRUser SageTV Beta Test Software 10 03-02-2004 08:03 AM
Changes in back-to-back recording handling JasonJoel SageTV Beta Test Software 1 01-24-2004 11:19 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.