SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV Products > SageTV Media Extender
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Media Extender Discussion related to any SageTV Media Extender used directly by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to a SageTV supported media extender should be posted here. Use the SageTV HD Theater - Media Player forum for issues related to using an HD Theater while not connected to a SageTV server.

View Poll Results: Of the one's who have it
Do you wish you waited for a more stable unit 5 7.94%
Wish you didn't order it all together 0 0%
Glad you ordered it and you like it 58 92.06%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2008, 03:44 PM
rdefino rdefino is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 771
Let's hear your opinions on the HD-200's

I haven't ordered mine yet, waiting to hear what others think about it. Take the Poll and also let's hear your opinion about the HD-200.

Thanks
__________________
SageTv server: 2008 64 BIT R2, Asus MN2-E, AMD dual core 4200, 4gb ram, Promise raid 5 8TB, 80gb Sata boot drive w/OS, 2/ dual tuner HDhomeruns, HD-PVR

3/HD-100's, 1/HD-200
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2008, 03:59 PM
Brent Brent is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: KC, Missouri
Posts: 3,695
You'll likely find two groups of people with opinions on this.

1. If you use the HD200 primarily as a SageTV Extender - I expect you will find that this group should be extremely happy with the HD200 - especially compared to the HD100 at the same price. HD200 is faster, more memory, has active USB2 ports and as a bonus has stand-alone mode which adds some additional features.

2. If you use the HD200 primarily as a Stand-Alone Media Player - this group likely has different needs and probably more that are new to the SageTV user interface that is on the box. Plus SageTV is pretty new to the stand-alone "market" so they are still learning and updating the firmware for this functionality. My guess is, this group will be more mixed in their reaction although I really don't know for sure.

I'm in group 1 and can say I'm very happy with the HD200.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2008, 04:08 PM
TakeFlight's Avatar
TakeFlight TakeFlight is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 150
I'm extremely satisfied with the HD200. So far I only use it with SageTV (not stand-alone). It does what it's supposed to do with no fuss and with the best picture quality I've gotten from SageTV ever.
__________________
Pegasus - SageTV/HomeSeer Server: Core2Duo 1.8GHz, 1GB, 1.5TB RAID5, 2.25TB RAID5, Radeon X1050, (2) Hauppauge PVR250 (only used for security cameras now), SiliconDust HDHomeRun, Hauppauge HD-PVR, WinXP Pro
Prometheus - SageTV Client: Core2Duo 2.66GHz, 1GB, 500GB, GeForce 8400GS, WinXP Pro, 848x480 to InFocus SP4805 projector on a 78" screen
HD Theater (HD200) connected via HDMI to Panasonic TH-42PX60U 42" plasma
web server plugin | 2 MediaMVP Extenders | FiOS TV
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2008, 04:28 PM
Apap's Avatar
Apap Apap is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 216
I am very happy with my HD-200. I set it up in minutes and the picture quality is excellent and have had no problems with any file I've thrown at it. The UI is definitely faster than my HD-100.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2008, 07:16 PM
mayamaniac's Avatar
mayamaniac mayamaniac is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,177
I'm lucky as with the HD-PVR, I have almost zero problems with the HD200. Not to say that the HD200 is flawless, it does have some flaws. Here are some of the pros and cons for me:

Pros:
- Navigation is a lot faster. Moving around the menus is smoother and noticeably more responsive than the HD100.
- USB support is really cool in standalone mode. Connect a USB hard drive and play your media files off it. Connect a USB media card reader and it will read all your pictures from the flash memory of your digital camera.
- Compact design. It's just slightly bigger than the MVP. More portable to pack if you decide to travel with it using placeshifter mode.
- HDMI cable included. The HD100 I bought didn't include one.

Cons:
- I hear a loud "pop" sound from the speakers when I turn on the unit. It doesn't happen all the time, but once a while. Not as annoying as the MVP's squeek, but it is similar. I use audio thru HDMI.
- It takes about 2 seconds for audio to come on after the video start playing on any show I watch, recorded or imported video.
- It takes a little bit too long to power up, roughly 15 seconds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent View Post
You'll likely find two groups of people with opinions on this.

1. If you use the HD200 primarily as a SageTV Extender

2. If you use the HD200 primarily as a Stand-Alone Media Player

I'm in group 1 and can say I'm very happy with the HD200.
I still see the HD200 as an extender first and foremost. I see the standalone as an added feature, not the main purpose of the device. But that could change if they start adding true support for Hulu, Netflix, TVersity, etc.

Overall, I'm happy with it and will probably buy another one soon.
__________________
Mayamaniac

- SageTV 7.1.9 Server. Win7 32bit in VMWare Fusion. HDHR (FiOS Coax). HDHR Prime 3 Tuners (FiOS Cable Card). Gemstone theme.
- SageTV HD300 - HDMI 1080p Samsung 75" LED.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2008, 09:12 PM
tedson tedson is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 88
My wife has requested I move the 100 from the bedroom and replace the 200 in the den with it. She expects to turn the TV on and just have it work. So things like it randomly shuts off, the audio takes a while to kick in after changing channels, it takes a long time to start up compared to the 100, etc. make her dislike it. I think in the long run it will be a better unit when it is more stable, but for now it's getting a thumbs down from the wife. And honestly we could care less about the stand alone stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2008, 09:26 PM
hockeyfan hockeyfan is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 70
The *only* problem I've had is I can't play a ripped blu-ray of the dark knight, works fine using sagetvclient. Aside from that everything is a plus. The remote response is much better. That alone has vastly improved the WAF (gawd I actually used that acronym).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2008, 10:00 PM
rswoods rswoods is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 90
The poll needs a fourth choice.

Of the one's who have it
1) Do you wish you waited for a more stable unit
2) Wish you didn't order it all together
3) Glad you ordered it and you like it
4) Glad you ordered it and you like it, but are patiently waiting for a firmware upgrade to fix the power on/off issue.

Every couple of days I have to powercycle it because the power button on the remote fails to turn it on. I contacted support and they say they are aware of this and it should be fixed in the next firmware upgrade.

Other than that, I like it a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:15 PM
Shield Shield is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent View Post
You'll likely find two groups of people with opinions on this.

1. If you use the HD200 primarily as a SageTV Extender - I expect you will find that this group should be extremely happy with the HD200 - especially compared to the HD100 at the same price. HD200 is faster, more memory, has active USB2 ports and as a bonus has stand-alone mode which adds some additional features.

2. If you use the HD200 primarily as a Stand-Alone Media Player - this group likely has different needs and probably more that are new to the SageTV user interface that is on the box. Plus SageTV is pretty new to the stand-alone "market" so they are still learning and updating the firmware for this functionality. My guess is, this group will be more mixed in their reaction although I really don't know for sure.

I'm in group 1 and can say I'm very happy with the HD200.

Or, a 3rd group; long time Sage users who are getting their first extender and hate the fact it doesn't decode DTS or play back their non-perfect mkv files (unlike the full client)....
__________________
HD300/HD200 clients
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:34 PM
Olias's Avatar
Olias Olias is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 179
As a video player it's great, as a music device for playing back flac ripped CDs, it sucks.
The HD200 has the same problems as the HD100 when playing flac files; listen to a long enough playlist and the unit locks up. Rewind or fast forward within a song, the unit locks up.
Support is aware of the situation, but I guess they are busy tweaking the video side of things and not spending any time on the audio side.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:43 PM
Brent Brent is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: KC, Missouri
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shield View Post
Or, a 3rd group; long time Sage users who are getting their first extender and hate the fact it doesn't decode DTS or play back their non-perfect mkv files (unlike the full client)....
do you have any way you could share an example of a file or files like this that aren't working on the HD200 for me? I'm just curious about something...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-17-2008, 10:18 AM
Shield Shield is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent View Post
do you have any way you could share an example of a file or files like this that aren't working on the HD200 for me? I'm just curious about something...
I had a bunch last week, but fixed them all by re-encoding. The most surprising one was the home movie footage that I shot that locked up the extender. This was a HDV mpg file. I redid it and it's fine now. If I come across something again I'll let you know. The DTS thing is a bummer - I can have my sound card decode DTS in the full Sage client; I don't want to have to have a receiver at every TV that has an extender. Oh well, only a handful of movies I have are using DTS. There's an application called "Popcorn Movie converter" that I'm using to re-encode these back to AC3 and it's free.
__________________
HD300/HD200 clients
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-17-2008, 01:16 PM
jasmithvr6 jasmithvr6 is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 90
First time Media Extender buyer, long-time Sage user. After hooking up the HD200 last night I'm pleased with the performance thus far. It's responsive and supports 1080p resolution. HD programming PQ is exceptional and silky smooth. Configuration was a breeze and I was up and running in about an hour. Being this is my first media extender, I have a few gripes:

1. Interface video resolution is set at 1080p and is crystal clear, however when viewing Program Guide, the channel lineup resolution/font is no where near that of the main menu. Almost looks like it is being pulled directly from Sage Server (which it may very well be...not sure). In fact it looks very primative IMHO. Not sure what is driving this, but something I will need to research further.

2. To continue on the PQ theme, standard digital PQ (nonHD) is less than desirable. Another work in process. But to be fair, this may have more to do with the tuner card than the HD200 itself. I'm running dual HVR-1600's.

3. While the remote control provides full functionality of Sage, it's cheaply made and poorly designed. I would strongly consider picking up another remote. I already ordered a Harmony 550 to improve WAF.

Overall I'm happy with the unit so far. I plan on running some stress tests this weekend before going live with the family.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-17-2008, 06:07 PM
TexasTruck TexasTruck is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4
I love it! I have an HD100 which is used a lot. Solid unit, except for the HD aspects. I knew (hoped is more like it) Sage would develop a unit that is more reliable for playing HD than the HD100, introducing the HD200! I simply swapped out the HD100 with the HD200 the day it arrived, and aside from the AC3 issue (please fix this!), DVDs and now Bluray play perfectly. I'm on the fence with the UI performance increase, it seems the same to me, but I never complained about it using the HD100 either, meh..... I don't use the standalone mode, mainly because I couldn't get my Bluray movies to play, they still stuttered like the HD100. I switch to server mode (used the same client license the HD100 used) and walla, Bluray worked out of the box! I don't use the TV recording function (DVR) except for recording shows we're going to miss (a fancy VCR). But the shows I do record, I see the same behavior and functionality as the HD100 shows.

Anyway, like any new product there will be problems and with my experiance with SageTV the last year and half, they fix issues - period.

If I only had another HD TV, I'd buy another.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:02 PM
tedson tedson is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 88
Since moving the HD200 into the bedroom, I have installed the beta firmware on it. Normally, I avoid betas. It has made a big difference in the number of random shutdowns and lockups.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:26 PM
wayner wayner is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 7,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasmithvr6 View Post
3. While the remote control provides full functionality of Sage, it's cheaply made and poorly designed. I would strongly consider picking up another remote. I already ordered a Harmony 550 to improve WAF.
You're right but I have Harmony remotes with all of my TVs that have more than one source so I have zero interest in paying $1 more for a better remote. In fact I would even suggest that Sage not include any cables and cut the price by $10-$20 dollars. I buy my cables pretty cheaply on monoprice.com and I sure don't need another red-white-yellow RCA cable to add to my collection. And HDMI is the most expensive of the cables and I am not using it as the HDMI inputs are full on my main HT and in the other two setups my receiver (or TV) doesn't have HDMI inputs. The cables that I needed, component and optical audio, are the only ones not included.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA
Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA
Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-18-2008, 05:37 PM
Para Para is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 156
The HD200 is well worth the money in my opinion. 1080P, silent, etc. I moved my pc out of the living room and now have a truly silent SAGE system feeding my Samsung 52". The responsiveness of the interface is sometimes a little slower than it was with my pc doing the job but the difference is minor. Generally, it is when the HD200 is downloading info from the server (like the video recording list, etc).

Thanks SAGE!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HD PVR Woes Striker:WG Hardware Support 4 12-01-2008 05:58 PM
List of issues Sage 6.3.6 with HD extender Spriter SageTV Beta Test Software 5 01-24-2008 09:31 AM
HD Homerun Recording High CPU Usage smarty Hardware Support 6 10-18-2007 05:31 AM
The Beginning of the End? lobosrul General Discussion 76 05-01-2007 06:39 PM
Multiple HD recording issue ptaylor Hardware Support 0 02-23-2007 11:10 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.