Double List users?

[bialio]

Does anyone use the Double List UMB? I'm thinking about retiring it (actually rewriting it completely, but for a few releases it will be gone).

The code in the double list is very hard to maintain - especially compared with the other UMB variants.

But I don't want to piss anyone off by just yanking it - but I'd rather just piss off a few people than a bunch once we go public.....

btl.

[wrems]

Which one is the double list again.... I don't think I use that one, but not sure off the top of my head... Regardless, do what you need to do. If that means pulling it, then pull it. Do you have a screenshot handy....

[wrems]

Are you thinking 314 will be a public release?...

[bialio]

No. In 314 when you delete something it doesn't get removed from the UMB until you reload the view - this is a known issue, which I have mostly fixed in the code since then, and was introduced by making changes to make sorts on views sticky, but that's the main thing I want to fix before we open it up to the masses. There are probably some other features the others want to fix as well.

btl.

[stuckless]

Originally Posted by bialio

No. In 314 when you delete something it doesn't get removed from the UMB until you reload the view - this is a known issue, which I have mostly fixed in the code since then, and was introduced by making changes to make sorts on views sticky, but that's the main thing I want to fix before we open it up to the masses. There are probably some other features the others want to fix as well.

btl.

Brian, I did add code to remove the items from the views as well... is it not working? (I thought I had fixed it)

[bialio]

Your code is working. If you delete from a view where you have a MediaFile that has a reference to the view it's part of that works fine.

If you delete after watching from the OSD (where there isn't a reference to the view in the MediaFile) your code doesn't handle that situation - which I don't see how it could.

btl.

[stuckless]

Originally Posted by bialio

Your code is working. If you delete from a view where you have a MediaFile that has a reference to the view it's part of that works fine.

If you delete after watching from the OSD (where there isn't a reference to the view in the MediaFile) your code doesn't handle that situation - which I don't see how it could.

btl.

Yeah... that is interesting... when I have I IMediaFile i get a reference to the parent as well, so it's easy to remove itself from the parent. That's harder to do when you just have the sage mediafile. If you want, i can try to create a utility method that might help with this?

[bialio]

I'm able to handle it pretty well - the DecoratedMediaFile and SageMediaFile both return the same hash on GetId(), so I just use that.

btl.

[PiX64]

I don't use the double list..ever

incase it matters to you :-)

[stuckless]

Originally Posted by bialio

I'm able to handle it pretty well - the DecoratedMediaFile and SageMediaFile both return the same hash on GetId(), so I just use that.

btl.

Yeah, getId() should always return the unique id of the item... so in the case of sage media item, it doesn't matter if it's decorated or not, it should always return the same id.

[Gustovier]

I don't use it. Once the grid view came along. Now I use Grid exclusively, only issue that stops grid from being perfect for me is the scroll speed on my hd300