SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > General Discussion > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:33 AM
Ken C Ken C is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 446
PQ analog vs SD digital

I currently have analog cable feeding into Sage and then to a HD100, set to 1080p, and finally, into a Sammy 40" LCD. All recording is set to the highest MPEG2 quality. The picture quality is very good.

What I'm wondering is, if I get a HDHR, will the standard definition digital channels have better PQ than the analogs ? I know the HD's will but will there be any noticeable difference between analog and SD digital on my setup ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:23 AM
jrog's Avatar
jrog jrog is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 172
with my HDHR, I saw no point in mapping digital channels that weren't High Definition. I know there are a handful that are SD digital, but they aren't channels I was interested in. I don't have clear QAM for non locals.

However, seeing as how they are still digital, there is no need to re-encode them, so the quality is as good as it's going to be, and free of ghosting or other issues that can plague an analog signal.
__________________
SageTV Server - Q6600, 2GB Ram, 2x 750GB recording, HDHomerun 2xQAM, PVR-USB2, 2x HD-PVR, USB-UIRT controller 2 HD boxes and one SD box

3x HD100 HD Extenders
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:59 AM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrog View Post
with my HDHR, I saw no point in mapping digital channels that weren't High Definition. I know there are a handful that are SD digital, but they aren't channels I was interested in. I don't have clear QAM for non locals.

However, seeing as how they are still digital, there is no need to re-encode them, so the quality is as good as it's going to be, and free of ghosting or other issues that can plague an analog signal.
When I was using clear qam, I didn't have the SD changes in digital. When I swtiched to OTA, any channel that has both an HD and an SD, I only record off the HD. I figure there is no reason to worry about the SD signals. I do have a dual tuner setup for OTA analog, but that is solely incase my HDHomerun already has both tuners in use and I need to record something.
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:40 AM
pjpjpjpj pjpjpjpj is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,164
Ken,

To answer your question simply, I think it would depend on the PQ sent by your analog cable company, sent by the channel itself, and also by the quality of the tuner.

As a user of an HDHR with OTA, I have several SD digital channels that I watch - plus all of my local newscasts except one are still in SD. There is a noticeable difference between them, even from SD digital to SD digital (in this case, it often directly correlates to the bandwidth that the channel allocates to its main channel). I watch quite a few PBS shows on the SD subchannels, and some of the shows (and some of the channels themselves, across-the-board) look fantastic, while some look fairly poor. For example, when a show is filmed in HD, then sent on a subchannel that is only SD (giving the dreaded "picturebox" framing), I can use the zoom on my TV to fill the screen and it often looks pretty respectable... whereas some shows that are filmed and broadcast in SD (and not even zoomed) look worse than the zoomed HD->SD shows.

Long story, uh, even longer , I don't think there is any one answer to your question. Digital is the best you can get, analog can have issues; but the PQ you get in SD depends on the source and the tuner.
__________________
Server: AMD Athlon II x4 635 2.9GHz, 8 Gb RAM, Win 10 x64, Java 8, Gigabit network
Drives: Several TB of internal SATA and external USB drives, no NAS or RAID or such...
Software: SageTV v9x64, stock STV with ADM.
Tuners: 4 tuners via (2) HDHomeruns (100% OTA, DIY antennas in the attic).
Clients: Several HD300s, HD200s, even an old HD100, all on wired LAN. Latest firmware for each.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recommended NAS? KJake Hardware Support 531 02-28-2010 11:59 AM
SageTV Digital Analog Channel Conflicts OldPCGUY SageTV EPG Service 8 02-13-2008 11:06 AM
Handling cable lineups with both digital and analog content dalleyg SageTV EPG Service 8 08-07-2007 12:27 AM
Prefer SD digital source over SD analog dwalton22 SageTV Software 5 02-21-2007 07:36 AM
Digital and analog tuners on one lineup? gmanning SageTV Software 1 12-24-2006 01:59 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.